Why is a 545-Mile Bicycle Ride A Case Study of Collaborative Governance?
Silver World: Science in International Policy Making
The Edwards Aquifer
Pablo-Burford Sustainable Water Quality Network
DeBola: A Prisoner's Dilemma Simulation-Game for NGOs
The Whittier Sewer Project Case
Cross-sector Collaboration and Urban Revitalization in Buffalo, NY
Corruption in Atlantikk Simulation
The Great Pacific Garbage Patch Simulation
Building a Healthy Community
A Struggle for Power and Control over Service Delivery in the Nonprofit Sector
Implementing the Earned Income Tax Credit at AccountAbility Minnesota
When a Highway Divides a City: Improving Decision Making in Syracuse, New York
Practicing Textbook Tools and Confronting Challenges That Textbooks Don’t
Adoption of Technology Open Standards Policy by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Collaboration for Civic Change: Connecting High-Tech Growth and Community Well-Being
Oltre La Norma! Collaborating for the Reconstruction of Teatro Petruzzelli in Bari
Combat and Collaboration in Seattle’s Historic Minimum Wage Debate
Explore by:
Conversations in Conflict Studies with Professor Sabina Schnell
400 Eggers Hall, the PARCC Conference Room
Add to: Outlook, ICal, Google Calendar
Vision, Voice, and Technology: Is There a Global "Open Government" Trend?
Sabina Schnell, Assistant Professor of Public Administration and International Affairs.
“Open government” is being hailed as a new governance paradigm. But while everybody pays lip-service to it, are governments around the world becoming more open? I look at changes in both the meaning and the practice of government openness around the world in the last decades. A few main trends are identified. First, the technological meaning of openness is increasingly supplanting the rights-based understanding of it. Second, even though more and more countries are joining global transparency and openness initiatives, global averages on budget transparency or open data have barely budged. Third, while autocracies are catching up to democracies in terms of using online tools to inform and consult citizens, we see an incipient democratic rollback around the world, including a shrinking space for civil society. Yet, the most significant changes in government transparency (“vision”) and citizen participation (“voice”) have gone hand-in-hand with processes of democratization. I conclude that, if we narrow down government openness to a set of tools and technologies used at will, as opposed to a set of legally embedded rights that guarantee access to information and participation independent of who is in power, we risk ending up with governments that are more closed rather than more open to genuine societal inputs.
Conversations in Conflict Studies is a weekly educational speaker series for students, faculty, and the community. The series, sponsored by PARCC, draws its speakers from Syracuse University faculty, national and international scholars and activists, and PhD students. Pizza is served. Follow us on Twitter @PARCCatMaxwell, tweet #ConvoInConflict.
If you require accommodations, please contact Deborah Toole by email at datoole@syr.edu or by phone at 315.443.2367.
Open to
Public
Contact
Accessibility
Contact to request accommodations